- Malayalam Rosary Full
- Konda Malayalam Prayer
- Rosary In Malayalam
- Japamala Malayalam Prayer Audio
- Japamala Prayer Malayalam Mp3
Sep 02, 2010 First Mystery – Onhaam Daiva Rahasiyam Parishudha daiva maathaave, ange thirukumaaran paadupettu marichu moonnaam naal, ennenneykkum jeevikkunnavanaayi uyirthu ezhunnettathinaalundaaya mahimaye orthu dhyaanikkunna njangal, paapam aakunna maranathil ninnum nithyammayi uyirthezhunnelpan krupa cheyyename. Malayalam christian prayers. Home; japamala malayalam; kurisinte vazhi malayalam; retreat centers in kerala; bible verses malayalam; malayalam christian songs; picture gallery; vachana deepthi; youtube songs; viswasapramanam. Apr 29, 2019 Holy Rosary in malayalam (Japamala). All prayers of rosary audio and text form including,. Prarambha prarthana. Vishwasapramaanam. Mysteries of rosary in malayalam. Litany song (karthave kaniyaname) as well as usual (karthave anugrahikaname) form. Day. Aug 24, 2013 Japamala Malayalam - Audio Rosary In Malayalam: Android app (4.8 ★, 100,000+ downloads) → Holy Rosary in malayalam (Japamala). All prayers of rosary audio and text form.
Malayalam Rosary Full
Google Play Rating history and histogram
Changelog
No changelog data
Developer information
Vettiyankal H, Palambra PO, Pattimattom, Kanjirapally, Kottayam, Kerala, India. Serial and unlock request code gta 4 free. PIN:686518
Description
The Holy Rosary Audio on the go,in Malayalam..!!Now user can suggest pilgrim centers directly from the app.
Suvishesha petti widget are now available.
App will automatically select day and mysteries.
Two Rosary type:-
53 beads rosary
203 beads rosary(full rosary)
Joyful (mon - sat)
Sorrowful (tue - fri)
Luminous (thu)
Glorious (sun - wed)
Litany
Volume up and down keys to count each beads. Or '+' button to count each beads.
Prayers Added
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ Karunayude Japamala Audio.
¤ St.Alphonsa Prayer.
¤ St.Joseph Prayer.
¤ St.Jude Prayer.
¤ Karunayude Japamala Text.
¤ Infant Jesus Prayer.
¤ Kurishinte Vazhi (Way Of Cross in malayalam)
¤ Suvishesha Petty.
¤ Novena Prayers (prarthana)
Permissions are for:
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
Photos/Media/Files : To load and use the rosary images and audio files.
Wi-Fi connection information : To check internet connection. Wallpaper images are fetched online.
Device ID & call information : To pause playing audio while an incoming call arrives.
Recent changes:
Added May devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Now user can suggest pilgrim centers directly from the app.
Suvishesha petti widget are now available.
App will automatically select day and mysteries.
Two Rosary type:-
53 beads rosary
203 beads rosary(full rosary)
Joyful (mon - sat)
Sorrowful (tue - fri)
Luminous (thu)
Glorious (sun - wed)
Litany
Volume up and down keys to count each beads. Or '+' button to count each beads.
Prayers Added
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
¤ Karunayude Japamala Audio.
¤ St.Alphonsa Prayer.
¤ St.Joseph Prayer.
¤ St.Jude Prayer.
¤ Karunayude Japamala Text.
¤ Infant Jesus Prayer.
¤ Kurishinte Vazhi (Way Of Cross in malayalam)
¤ Suvishesha Petty.
¤ Novena Prayers (prarthana)
Permissions are for:
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
Photos/Media/Files : To load and use the rosary images and audio files.
Wi-Fi connection information : To check internet connection. Wallpaper images are fetched online.
Device ID & call information : To pause playing audio while an incoming call arrives.
Recent changes:
Added May devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Comments
We don't have enough comments to generate tag clouds.Please check back later.
Google Play Rankings
Permissions
Libraries
Related apps
The contents of the Buddha chitta mala page were merged into Japamala. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (February 2020) |
The contents of the Buddhist Prayer Beads page were merged into Japamala. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (February 2020) |
WikiProject Hinduism / Krishnaism | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WikiProject Buddhism | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
To be added after checking meruAndries 23:56, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
WikiProject Religion | (Rated Start-class) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The 'history of the mala' section was actually an unsubstantiated story about how Christians got the idea for the rosary from India, so I removed it. If you have proof then put it back. I've heard Hindus claim that early popes came to India to get the idea of God becoming man, so we can't take all of these thing seriously. 71.198.169.9 22:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, as the mala is used in both Hindu and Buddhist practices, this article should not come under the Wiki Hinduism umbrella. To be balanced, this article should not be 'affiliated' with either the Hinduism or Buddhist umbrella. Links to both are included in the main article which is very clear as separate sections for both are included. --Ant108 10:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't know how to do it but the page 'mala' does not point here. Activate carmike rewards card login. OldAndTired (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
108[edit]
While this is most common, there are other possible numbers depending on religion/sect--it doesn't have to be 108 as the article seems to suggest. I do not know enough about it, however, to edit the article and provide proper information, as in my particular sect of Buddhism, 108 is often used. If someone else who is more knowledgable wouldn't mind.. --Somnilocus 03:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I added the word 'often'. It says elsewhere in the article 'In Tibetan Buddhism, larger malas are often used of, say, 111 beads'. Chopper Dave 03:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
No, in Tibet, all malas are 108 beads, it cannot be another number whether the beads are large or small. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.176.110 (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Need for sources[edit]
Currently the article is poorly sourced. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability 'The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article. Quotations should also be attributed. Free full version plants vs zombies. If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.' In order to improve the quality of this article I request that we raise the bar on content quality by ensuring that any additions to the article be done in a manner consistent with that policy. Buddhipriya 19:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Objection to spam link section[edit]
I object to the restoration of the spam link section. Please read WP:EL and WP:SPAM for general guidance on what should be considered for a link. These sites do not cite any reliable sources and push specific religous groups. They are inappropriate for this article. It is not 'too harsh' to expect that policy on links be followed. Buddhipriya 09:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- On articles such as this it just seems too much like 'nit-picking' to remove links because they are from specific religious groups. Who else is really all that interested in Japa for example, other than religious groups? If we give only cold, intellectual links (if they even exist in this context) then that's missing the whole point in my opinion. As long as enough links are given from a variety of sources, and they are not blatant spam, (i.e selling japa beads) then I really don't see the harm? The guidelines should not stop us from providing the reader with relevant information. Gouranga(UK) 09:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- The sites do not meet the tests for being WP:RS because they do not cite any reliable sources. Hence they cannot be used to source the article. Adding a link to a religious group is promotional spam. All such links should be removed. There could be dozens of such groups that wish to be listed, and some of the articles I have seen have been link farms for religious advertising. We must raise the bar on source quality and get this article referenced using [[[WP:RS]], not web sites of this type. Buddhipriya 09:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- I would argue that prominent religious persons, and their viewpoints on Japa Mala are at least as reliable as any other source in this matter. For example, what is wrong with linking to a webpage which list Sivananda Swami's advice on Japa and Japa Mala? This is a useful link and it does not detract from the article. Nor is it being used as a reference. I agree we should avoid spam, but on articles of a religious nature religious websites seem highly appropriate as long as they are directly discussing the subject matter. Gouranga(UK) 10:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- How do we decide which teachers are notable? If Swami X puts up a page somewhere, do we have to list it? Why are bead stores listed? (http://www.thebeadsite.com/BBRS-01.html) That site cites no reliable sources whatsover and makes no claims of religious notability. It is commercial linkspam. Buddhipriya 22:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- That website appears to be an information site only, although it does contain links to other commercial sites. I'm not saying we should list every site under the sun, but neither do I see the need of removing sites which might be of interest and are relevant. If an article becomes a gigantic links directory, then yes, pick the better ones out and remove the others - but otherwise what's the harm in leaving them alone? We both know that Swami Sivananda is notable, and the article reads as relevant - as with the others. Why worry about it? Gouranga(UK) 11:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- The reason to worry about it is that source quality requires WP:RS, and sites that do not quote them are not usable as sources. Promoting commercial bead sites that have little or no information of value is linkspam. Promotion of religious groups via Wikipedia is objectionable advertising. Antyhing the EL section is subject to consensus. Since I am objecting to the links, we clearly have no consensus. Wikipedia is not a link farm. May I at least remove the bead store? Buddhipriya 05:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- That website appears to be an information site only, although it does contain links to other commercial sites. I'm not saying we should list every site under the sun, but neither do I see the need of removing sites which might be of interest and are relevant. If an article becomes a gigantic links directory, then yes, pick the better ones out and remove the others - but otherwise what's the harm in leaving them alone? We both know that Swami Sivananda is notable, and the article reads as relevant - as with the others. Why worry about it? Gouranga(UK) 11:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hindu prayer beads?[edit]
A thought, if the article Rosary is not given the title Christian prayer beads, or for that matter Misbaha as Islamic prayer beads, then this article also should be moved to its actual term japa mala. --Ekabhishektalk 13:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree and support moving to Japa mala, which is the common name anyways. First Light (talk) 08:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Proposed Merge of Similar Articles[edit]
We have three articles (this one, Buddhist Prayer Beads, and Buddha chitta mala on substantially the same topic. As this is the title that applies to Buddhist and Hindu malas, it seems like this is the logical place to consolidate things, particularly given that there is relatively little information on Hindu practice right now. There is a previous merge mentioned on the Talk:Buddhist prayer beads page, but there still seems to be two articles that are largely covering the same material. --Spasemunki (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Konda Malayalam Prayer
Mala (prayer beads) or some other appropriate title. Japamala has the advantage of being the title used in some of the relevant reference material as Farang Rak Tham points out, as well as solving the disambiguation issue. Some malas are used for counting prostrations, but I don't know of other uses that don't involve some kind of recitation, and that is the origin of their use in the Buddhist tradition according to the Agamas. --Spasemunki (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Rosary In Malayalam
'Through association with nembutsu-practice, a person’s rosary often comes to be a revered object; touching it may immediately start the recitation revolving in the mind, and bring on the associated mental states. .. After faith has arisen, any recitation is done solely as an expression of gratitude, often shown by merely wearing a rosary wrapped around the hand. This is also a reminder that ‘sinful humans’ are but a bundle of passions compared to Amitābha.'[3]
- Spasemunki notes just above that they are used to count prostrations which are themselves not recitations even though prostrations typically involve a short prayer or mantra. That use is noted in the Buddhist prayer beads lead section as is the practise of counting breaths.
- I clicked the first five links on a websearch for how to use mala and four of them mentioned or described in detail how to use them for counting breaths, one calling it pranayama practise. Three of those sites mentioned that they are called japa mala or japamala but only one of those three used it in context. That single website used 'japamala' just 2 times while 'mala' appeared alone over 60 times. All five sites predominantly or exclusively used mala.
- Having written that, let's pause this part of the discussion until someone formally proposes the move as its own topic at which time we can come up with (better) reasons for or against a move. Waerloeg (talk) 01:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- Waerloeg, a formal proposal is not required for a move, consensus is.-- 09:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and merged the material from the two articles. Let me know if I missed anything- I did a little editing en route because of the amount of redundant or unreferenced material involved. --Spasemunki (talk) 01:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Japamala Malayalam Prayer Audio
References
- ^ abBuswell, Robert E. Jr.; Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2013). 'Japamālā'(PDF). Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-15786-3. Archived(PDF) from the original on 12 June 2018.
- ^https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/eastern-religions/hinduism/mantra
- ^Harvey, Peter (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: teachings, history and practices(PDF) (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 255–256. ISBN978-0-521-85942-4.